CyberArk vs Microsoft Entra ID
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Entra ID is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 66 versus 15.6 for CyberArk, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose CyberArk if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 45% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
Choose Microsoft Entra ID if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (66 vs 15.6)
- Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
- Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
- Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 66% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | up+5.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 12.9% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 40 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 45% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Microsoft Entra ID +5.100000000000001pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Entra ID leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
30 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | — |
| Founded | 1999 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | — |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | — |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | — |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Microsoft Entra ID
- Native integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure ecosystems
- Cost-effective fit for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365
- Strong workforce IAM with SSO, MFA and passwordless access
- Top-ranked and recognised as a Leader among IAM providers
- Strong for enterprise identity governance and hybrid environments
- Advanced add-ons carry extra yearly paid subscription costs
- Advanced features such as Conditional Access require paid tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Microsoft Entra ID”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-microsoft-entra-id, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.