CyberArk vs Silverfort
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 0 for Silverfort.
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
Choose Silverfort if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Silverfort |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | no change0% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Silverfort 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Silverfort |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | On-prem, cloud and hybrid |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | Standard support (included), Premier support, Diamond support, Expert Services |
| Founded | 1999 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | Plano, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | Series D · $222M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | Enterprises with Active Directory, legacy and hybrid environments that need to protect human, service-account and AI agent identities |
Plans side by side
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Silverfort
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Silverfort”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-silverfort, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.