CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
vs
StytchThe identity platform for humans & AI agents
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
CyberArk vs Stytch
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 2.1 for Stytch.
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 2.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 43% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
Choose Stytch if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA/BAA or PCI DSS (SAQ-A) coverage
- Good choice for a rapid MVP
- API-first platform with flexible building blocks
- Suits both consumer and B2B authentication
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 2.1% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | down−0.5% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 43% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · Stytch −0.19999999999999973pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CyberArkStytch
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0CyberArk ranked higher
0Stytch ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA/BAA, PCI DSS (SAQ-A) |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | Email support, Community Slack, Dedicated Slack channel (Enterprise), Enterprise support SLA |
| Founded | 1999 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | Series B |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | Developer teams building B2B SaaS or consumer apps that need enterprise-ready auth and AI agent authentication |
Plans side by side
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Stytch
- Good choice for a rapid MVP
- API-first platform with flexible building blocks
- Suits both consumer and B2B authentication
- Strong shortlist option for B2B SaaS
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs Stytch”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-stytch, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.