DataRobotThe platform enterprises trust to build, operate, and govern their agents.
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
DataRobot vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tray.ai is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 1.2 for DataRobot.
Choose DataRobot if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Automated machine learning (AutoML) capabilities
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 1.2)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | DataRobot | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #55 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 27% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DataRobot 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tray.ai leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DataRobotTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0DataRobot ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DataRobot | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid, on-premises, and air-gapped environments | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Online documentation, Support center | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Corporate minority round (SBI Holdings) | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need to take agentic AI from pilot into production. | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
DataRobot
Pricing not available.
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DataRobot
- Automated machine learning (AutoML) capabilities
- Robust enterprise monitoring and governance features
- Good fit for governed AutoML in regulated industries
- Analyst-friendly workflows for business users
- Free trial available
- Steep platform fees that scale aggressively
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DataRobot vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/datarobot-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.