DealHub vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
DealHub is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 33% of the answers that name both.
Choose DealHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 22301 or ISO 42001 or SOC 1 Type II or GDPR or CCPA or STAR Level 1 or STAR for AI Level 1 coverage
- no-code CPQ platform
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | DealHub | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.7% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #17 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 2.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 12 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DealHub 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
DealHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | DealHub | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #8 | #11 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #14 | #10 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #9 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DealHub | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | SaaS | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 22301, ISO 42001, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA, STAR Level 1, STAR for AI Level 1 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | 24/7 global support, Knowledge base and Academy | — |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Growth round | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Revenue teams at SaaS and services companies that manage complex subscription, consumption and hybrid deals across sales, RevOps, finance and legal. | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Plans side by side
Upland Qvidian
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DealHub
- no-code CPQ platform
- guided selling, quoting, and collaborative deal rooms
- best for unified quote-to-revenue and digital sales rooms
- strong for complex CPQ and revenue workflows
- useful for proposal creation with CPQ and sales-process automation
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DealHub vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/dealhub-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.