Proposify vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Proposify if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Proposify | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 41.4% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #2 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 9.4% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 49 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Proposify 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Proposify | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #2 | #11 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #10 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #5 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Proposify | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $49 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Email and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support | — |
| Founded | 2013 | — |
| Headquarters | Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Growth Equity - II (CB Insights) | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction. | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Plans side by side
Proposify
Upland Qvidian
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Proposify
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
- Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
- Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
- Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Proposify vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/proposify-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.