Responsive vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Responsive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Responsive | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.7% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #10 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 4% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 20 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Responsive 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Responsive | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #9 | #11 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #8 | #10 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #3 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Responsive | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $10,000 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Flexible hosting options | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Integrations | 32+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions | — |
| Founded | 2015 | — |
| Headquarters | Frisco, Texas, United States | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round led by Elevate Capital | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Plans side by side
Responsive
Upland Qvidian
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Responsive vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/responsive-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.