Descope vs OneLogin
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OneLogin is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 10.1 versus 1.9 for Descope, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Descope if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (62% vs 19% positive)
- You need CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or HIPAA or FedRAMP High coverage
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
Choose OneLogin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.1 vs 1.9)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Descope | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 10.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−3% | up+0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #26 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 62% | 19% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Descope −2pp · OneLogin +0.09999999999999964pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OneLogin leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Descope | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top identity and access management platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #7 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Descope | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $249 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High | ISO 27001, SOC 1, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Community support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineer | — |
| Founded | 2022 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, California, United States | Aliso Viejo, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed extension · $88M raised | Secondary market |
| Best for | Startups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers. | Organizations securing workforce, customer and partner access with SSO and MFA |
Plans side by side
Descope
OneLogin
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Descope
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
- Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use
OneLogin
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
- 30-day free trial and structured evaluation program
- SSO, MFA, provisioning and directory features in one IAM platform
- Robust app catalog and developer-friendly provisioning
- Vendor-agnostic, cost-effective alternative to Okta
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Descope vs OneLogin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/descope-vs-onelogin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.