Skip to content
SlateIndex
DescopeDrag & drop customer and agentic IAM for apps, AI agents and MCP servers.
vs
OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Descope vs Okta

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 1.9 for Descope, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.

Choose Descope if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (62% vs 39% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose Okta if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 1.9)
  • You want a lower entry price ($6 vs $249)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Descope Okta
Visibility score1.9%56.9%
Change vs last weekdown−3%down−0.9%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#26#2
Share of voice0.6%12.2%
Mentions this run238
Positive in AI answers62%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Descope 2%

Descope −2pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.4%
68.4%
AI Mode
0%
60%
Perplexity
3.7%
53.9%
DescopeOkta

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

1Descope ranked higher
2Okta ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDescopeOkta
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $249 / mo$6 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo · 30-day trial
DeploymentCloud SaaSCloud (SaaS)
Integrations—8000+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP HighISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4
SupportCommunity support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineerOnline support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans
Founded20222009
HeadquartersLos Altos, California, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees51–2005,000+
FundingSeed extension · $88M raisedIPO
Best forStartups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers.Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform.

Plans side by side

Descope

Free Forever$0month
Pro$249month, billed annually
Growth$799month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustom
Descope pricing

Okta

Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Okta pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Descope

  • Low-code option
  • High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
  • Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
  • Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use

    Okta

    • Market-leading IAM platform
    • Independent, cloud-native identity platform
    • Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
    • Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
    • Strong security effectiveness

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Descope vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/descope-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.