DescopeDrag & drop customer and agentic IAM for apps, AI agents and MCP servers.
vs
SilverfortRuntime identity security for AI, AD and cloud
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Descope vs Silverfort
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Descope is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0 for Silverfort.
Choose Descope if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or HIPAA or FedRAMP High coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Silverfort if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Descope | Silverfort |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | down−3% | no change0% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #26 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 62% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Descope −2pp · Silverfort 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Descope leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DescopeSilverfort
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Descope ranked higher
0Silverfort ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Descope | Silverfort |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $249 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS | On-prem, cloud and hybrid |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High | — |
| Support | Community support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineer | Standard support (included), Premier support, Diamond support, Expert Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, California, United States | Plano, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed extension · $88M raised | Series D · $222M raised |
| Best for | Startups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers. | Enterprises with Active Directory, legacy and hybrid environments that need to protect human, service-account and AI agent identities |
Plans side by side
Descope
Free Forever$0month
Pro$249month, billed annually
Growth$799month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Descope
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
- Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use
Silverfort
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Descope vs Silverfort”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/descope-vs-silverfort, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.