Devin vs Gemini Code Assist
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Devin is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 16.9 versus 10.1 for Gemini Code Assist, and ranks ahead in 10% of the answers that name both.
Choose Devin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.9 vs 10.1)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
- Best value agentic editor
Choose Gemini Code Assist if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (24% vs 12% positive)
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or HIPAA or HITRUST CSF or FINMA or PCI-DSS v4.0.1 or CSA STAR coverage
- Strong fit for Google Cloud-centric organizations
- Deep cloud-native ties and multi-environment deployment
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Devin | Gemini Code Assist |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.9% | 10.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #5 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 3.6% |
| Mentions this run | 29 | 19 |
| Positive in AI answers | 12% | 24% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Devin 0pp · Gemini Code Assist 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Devin leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
10 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Devin | Gemini Code Assist |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | ChatGPT | #7 | #5 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #9 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | ChatGPT | #6 | #4 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #8 | #5 |
| Best AI coding assistant with AI features | ChatGPT | #6 | #7 |
| Which AI coding assistant vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #9 | #8 |
| Which AI coding assistant vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #10 | #4 |
| Which AI coding assistant vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | ChatGPT | #7 | #6 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #9 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Devin | Gemini Code Assist |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plans | Managed through Google Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, HIPAA, HITRUST CSF, FINMA, PCI-DSS v4.0.1, CSA STAR |
| Support | Priority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | — |
| Funding | Series E · $3700M raised | — |
| Best for | Engineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agents | — |
Plans side by side
Devin
Gemini Code Assist
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Devin
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
- Best value agentic editor
- Fully autonomous software engineering
- Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
- Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
- Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements
Gemini Code Assist
- Strong fit for Google Cloud-centric organizations
- Deep cloud-native ties and multi-environment deployment
- GCP and Workspace integration
- Robust context window management in enterprise use
- Free trial available for paid offering
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Devin vs Gemini Code Assist”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/devin-vs-gemini-code-assist, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.