DevinThe autonomous software engineer
vs
Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Devin vs Kilo Code
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Devin is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 16.9 versus 5.3 for Kilo Code.
Choose Devin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.9 vs 5.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $20)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 12% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Devin | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.9% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #5 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 29 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 12% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Devin 0pp · Kilo Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Devin leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DevinKilo Code
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Devin ranked higher
0Kilo Code ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Devin | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 / mo | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plans | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | — |
| Support | Priority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | — |
| Funding | Series E · $3700M raised | Seed · $8M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agents | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. |
Plans side by side
Devin
Free$0month
Pro$20month
Max$200month
Teams$80month for team plan, plus $40/mo per full dev seat
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Devin
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
- Best value agentic editor
- Fully autonomous software engineering
- Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
- Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
- Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Devin vs Kilo Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/devin-vs-kilo-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.