DiceWhere tech connects.
vs
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Dice vs SeekOut
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SeekOut is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.3 for Dice, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Dice if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose SeekOut if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (25% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Dice | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #69 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Dice 0pp · SeekOut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SeekOut leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DiceSeekOut
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Dice ranked higher
1SeekOut ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Dice | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | ChatGPT | #8 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Dice | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023 |
| Support | — | Help center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan |
| Founded | 1990 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Centennial, Colorado, United States | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series C · $189M raised |
| Best for | Tech professionals searching for tech jobs, and employers hiring tech talent. | Solo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel |
Plans side by side
Dice
Pricing not available.
SeekOut
SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Dice
Profile in progress.
SeekOut
- Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
- Strong for sourcing passive talent
- Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Dice vs SeekOut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/dice-vs-seekout, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.