Skip to content
SlateIndex
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

SeekOut vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 5.3 for SeekOut, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose SeekOut if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $299)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 5.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 25% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric SeekOut Workable
Visibility score5.3%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#18#2
Share of voice1.9%7.2%
Mentions this run1138
Positive in AI answers25%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3SeekOut 5%

SeekOut 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.8%
34.1%
AI Mode
3.7%
29.4%
Perplexity
4.4%
26.7%
SeekOutWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

0SeekOut ranked higher
8Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSeekOutWorkable
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$149 per seat / mo$299 / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo · 15-day trial
DeploymentCloud, hosted on Microsoft AzureCloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportHelp center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full planPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20172012
HeadquartersBellevue, WA, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeries C · $189M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forSolo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnelCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

SeekOut

SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
SeekOut pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

SeekOut

  • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
  • Strong for sourcing passive talent
  • Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “SeekOut vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/seekout-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.