EskerAI automation suite for the Office of the CFO
vs
FyleEffortless expense management for your existing credit cards. Now part of Sage.
Comparison · Expense Management · weekly run Nov 2
Esker vs Fyle
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Fyle is the stronger AI pick in Expense Management: it has a visibility score of 14.8 versus 0 for Esker.
Choose Esker if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 9001 coverage
Choose Fyle if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.8 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or PCI DSS coverage
- seamless sync with accounting and ERP systems
- real-time expense tracking with corporate cards
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Esker | Fyle |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 14.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Expense Management | #30 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 4.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 21 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 11% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Esker 0pp · Fyle 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Fyle leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
EskerFyle
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Esker ranked higher
0Fyle ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Esker | Fyle |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | $11.99 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Multi-tenant SaaS cloud platform | Web app and mobile app |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 9001 | SOC 2 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, PCI DSS |
| Support | — | Basic email and knowledge base support, Optional premium support with live chat during business hours, 24/7 support via live chat and email for Business plan users, Named account manager on Business and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 1985 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Lyon, France | Newark, Delaware, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Round listed by Tracxn as Series A, amount not disclosed · $11M raised |
| Best for | — | Small businesses and mid-market companies that pay expenses on corporate credit cards. |
Plans side by side
Esker
Pricing not available.
Fyle
Growth$11.99active user/month, billed annually (min 5 users)
Business$14.99active user/month, billed annually (min 10 users)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, 250+ employees
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Esker
Profile in progress.
Fyle
- seamless sync with accounting and ERP systems
- real-time expense tracking with corporate cards
- auto-categorizes expenses based on learned behavior
- strong user ratings, around 4.8/5 on G2
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Esker vs Fyle”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/esker-vs-fyle, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.