EspoCRMFree open source CRM for managing contacts, sales, support, and marketing in one place.
vs
QuantifiedAI Sales Coaching & Roleplay That Wins
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
EspoCRM vs Quantified
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Quantified is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0 for EspoCRM.
Choose EspoCRM if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 9001 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Quantified if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | EspoCRM | Quantified |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #45 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
EspoCRM 0pp · Quantified 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Quantified leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
EspoCRMQuantified
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0EspoCRM ranked higher
0Quantified ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | EspoCRM | Quantified |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $15 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted or self-hosted (on-premise) | Cloud-hosted on AWS in US East (Ohio) or Europe (Frankfurt), with a logically isolated tenant for each customer |
| Integrations | 2000+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 9001 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | 12x5 support on Cloud plans, Community forum, Service request form | Team builds personas, scenarios and rubrics alongside the customer's team, Calibration of scoring with the customer's trainers, Hands-on help during rollout and a success team after launch, Email help@quantified.ai |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Texas, USA | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 1–10 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Raised Funding Round (undated, per Crunchbase) | Seed |
| Best for | Small and mid-size companies that want an affordable, customizable CRM, including self-hosted deployments. | Life sciences and regulated commercial teams that must certify reps and keep messaging on-label, such as pharma launch and training teams |
Plans side by side
EspoCRM
Basic$15per user/month, minimum 3 users
Enterprise$25per user/month, minimum 5 users
Ultimate$69per user/month, minimum 10 users
Quantified
Base (Quantified AI Roleplay)Customquoted per team and program
Standard (Quantified AI Sales Coaching Platform)Customquoted per team and program
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “EspoCRM vs Quantified”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/espocrm-vs-quantified, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.