FloatThe #1 rated resource management software
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Float vs Wrike
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 0 for Float.
Choose Float if…
- You want a lower entry price ($7 vs $10)
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR or B Corp certification coverage
Choose Wrike if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Float | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #48 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 26 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Float 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Wrike leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FloatWrike
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Float ranked higher
0Wrike ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Float | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $7 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, B Corp certification | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant |
| Support | 24/7 AI chat with Mon–Fri human support, Designated customer success contact on Enterprise, Priority support and custom SLAs on Enterprise | Professional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Remote | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series B |
| Best for | Agencies, professional services firms and in-house delivery teams that need to see who is doing what, at what cost, across every project. | Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale |
Plans side by side
Float
Starter$7per scheduled person/month
Pro$12per scheduled person/month
EnterpriseCustomannual contract only
Wrike
Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Float
Profile in progress.
Wrike
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
- Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
- Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
- Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
- Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Float vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/float-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.