FloQastLess manual work. More control.
vs
RampTime is money. Save both.
Comparison · Accounting Software · weekly run Nov 2
FloQast vs Ramp
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ramp is the stronger AI pick in Accounting Software: it has a visibility score of 5.4 versus 0.3 for FloQast.
Choose FloQast if…
- You need ISO 42001 or SOC 3 or SOC 1 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Ramp if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.4 vs 0.3)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (65% vs 0% positive)
- You need PCI DSS coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | FloQast | Ramp |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 5.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Accounting Software | #36 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.7% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 65% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
FloQast 0pp · Ramp 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ramp leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FloQastRamp
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0FloQast ranked higher
0Ramp ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | FloQast | Ramp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-native platform | — |
| Integrations | — | 200+ |
| Compliance | ISO 42001, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, SOC 1 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS |
| Support | — | Instant 24/7 AI help for any Ramp question or task, 24/7 chat support, 24/7 phone support on Plus and Enterprise, Dedicated account and customer success manager on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Sherman Oaks, California, United States | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series E · $282M raised | Series D-2 · $5000M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise accounting teams that need an audit-ready close, reconciliations and controls. | Startups and global enterprises alike; the free plan suits smaller teams that want to simplify finances. |
Plans side by side
Ramp
Free$0month per user
Plus$15month per user + platform fee based on team size
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual billing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
FloQast
Profile in progress.
Ramp
- User-friendly, intuitive interface
- Automated receipt matching
- Real-time spend controls
- Corporate cards combined with expense management
- Free or zero-fee pricing
- Steeper configuration curve and less modern user experience
- More centred on corporate cards than broader expense reporting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “FloQast vs Ramp”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/floqast-vs-ramp, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.