FusionAuth vs Keeper Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
FusionAuth is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose FusionAuth if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | FusionAuth | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 0.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+1% | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #29 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
FusionAuth +0.6pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
FusionAuth leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | FusionAuth | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $162 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, on-premises, hybrid, air-gapped, or FusionAuth Cloud (dedicated hosting) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA BAA available, GDPR | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe |
| Support | Community forums and GitHub, Email support, 24/7 email and phone support, Private Slack channel | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Broomfield, CO, United States | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Growth (led by Updata Partners) · $65M raised | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised |
| Best for | Developer and engineering teams that need customer authentication they can self-host or run on dedicated infrastructure. | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform |
Plans side by side
FusionAuth
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
FusionAuth
- Clear public pricing tiers
- Fully featured open-source self-hosted option
- No forced enterprise sales
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “FusionAuth vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fusionauth-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.