Keeper Security vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 0.5)
- You need more native integrations (8000+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keeper Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #36 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keeper Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #13 | #1 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #5 | #3 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #8 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keeper Security | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | 100+ | 8000+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised | IPO |
| Best for | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Keeper Security
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.