Keeper Security vs Ping Identity
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Ping Identity is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 22.5 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
Choose Ping Identity if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22.5 vs 0.5)
- You need more native integrations (350+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keeper Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 22.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | down−2.2% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #36 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 7.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · Ping Identity −4.699999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Ping Identity leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keeper Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #13 | #3 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| Which Identity & Access Management tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keeper Security | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Multi-tenant cloud, dedicated-tenant cloud, self-managed on-premises, hybrid, and FedRAMP-authorized environments |
| Integrations | 100+ | 350+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University | — |
| Founded | 2011 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | Denver, CO, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised | Acquisition by Thoma Bravo (take-private) |
| Best for | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform | Large enterprises and government bodies managing customer, workforce, partner and AI agent identities at scale |
Plans side by side
Keeper Security
Ping Identity
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Ping Identity
- Enterprise-grade identity security for large enterprises
- Strong for complex hybrid and federated environments
- Advanced federation, SSO, and directory services
- Strong customer identity (CIAM) and fraud prevention
- Highly rated by analysts and users
- Enterprise deployments can stretch budgets
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs Ping Identity”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-ping-identity, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.