FusionAuthDownloadable, API-first customer identity and auth you can deploy anywhere.
vs
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
FusionAuth vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
FusionAuth is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.6 for Omada.
Choose FusionAuth if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or HIPAA BAA available or GDPR coverage
- Clear public pricing tiers
Choose Omada if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | FusionAuth | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #29 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
FusionAuth +0.6pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
FusionAuth leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FusionAuthOmada
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0FusionAuth ranked higher
0Omada ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | FusionAuth | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $162 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, on-premises, hybrid, air-gapped, or FusionAuth Cloud (dedicated hosting) | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA BAA available, GDPR | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Community forums and GitHub, Email support, 24/7 email and phone support, Private Slack channel | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2009 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Broomfield, CO, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Growth (led by Updata Partners) · $65M raised | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Developer and engineering teams that need customer authentication they can self-host or run on dedicated infrastructure. | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Plans side by side
FusionAuth
Community$0self-hosted
Starter$162month, starting at, billed annually (1,000 MAUs)
Essentials$2,970month, starting at, billed annually (1,000 MAUs)
Enterprise$2,970month, starting at, billed annually (1,000 MAUs)
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
FusionAuth
- Clear public pricing tiers
- Fully featured open-source self-hosted option
- No forced enterprise sales
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “FusionAuth vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fusionauth-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.