Skip to content
SlateIndex
FusionAuthDownloadable, API-first customer identity and auth you can deploy anywhere.
vs
SailPointAdaptive identity security for every human, machine and AI identity
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

FusionAuth vs SailPoint

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SailPoint is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 14.3 versus 1 for FusionAuth.

Choose FusionAuth if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 50% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or HIPAA BAA available or GDPR coverage
  • Clear public pricing tiers
  • Fully featured open-source self-hosted option

Choose SailPoint if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.3 vs 1)
  • You need CSA STAR Level 2 or C5 or EU-US DPF or FedRAMP Moderate or GovRAMP or IRAP or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or Common Criteria coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Specialist in identity governance and administration

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric FusionAuth SailPoint
Visibility score1%14.3%
Change vs last weekup+1%up+0.4%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#29#8
Share of voice0.4%5.3%
Mentions this run117
Positive in AI answers100%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3FusionAuth 1%

FusionAuth +0.6pp · SailPoint −1.1999999999999993pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SailPoint leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.1%
21.4%
AI Mode
2%
10.2%
Perplexity
0%
18.5%
FusionAuthSailPoint

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0FusionAuth ranked higher
0SailPoint ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionFusionAuthSailPoint
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceFree; paid from $162 / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentSelf-hosted, on-premises, hybrid, air-gapped, or FusionAuth Cloud (dedicated hosting)Cloud (multi-tenant SaaS) and on-premises (IdentityIQ)
Integrations—200+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA BAA available, GDPRCSA STAR Level 2, C5, EU-US DPF, FedRAMP Moderate, GovRAMP, IRAP, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, Common Criteria
SupportCommunity forums and GitHub, Email support, 24/7 email and phone support, Private Slack channelCustomer support requests
Founded20092005
HeadquartersBroomfield, CO, United StatesAustin, Texas, United States
Employees51–2001,001–5,000
FundingGrowth (led by Updata Partners) · $65M raisedIPO
Best forDeveloper and engineering teams that need customer authentication they can self-host or run on dedicated infrastructure.Large enterprises with complex, hybrid or heavily regulated environments needing identity governance for human, machine and AI identities

Plans side by side

FusionAuth

Community$0self-hosted
Starter$162month, starting at, billed annually (1,000 MAUs)
Essentials$2,970month, starting at, billed annually (1,000 MAUs)
Enterprise$2,970month, starting at, billed annually (1,000 MAUs)
FusionAuth pricing

SailPoint

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

FusionAuth

  • Clear public pricing tiers
  • Fully featured open-source self-hosted option
  • No forced enterprise sales

    SailPoint

    • Specialist in identity governance and administration
    • Strong compliance, access reviews, and segregation of duties
    • Recognized by analysts and peer reviews for IGA
    • Suited to large, complex enterprise governance needs
    • High cost profile for enterprise deployments
    • Pricing requires custom quotes and multi-year contracts

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “FusionAuth vs SailPoint”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fusionauth-vs-sailpoint, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.