Skip to content
SlateIndex
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
vs
SailPointAdaptive identity security for every human, machine and AI identity
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

CyberArk vs SailPoint

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 14.3 for SailPoint, and ranks ahead in 45% of the answers that name both.

Choose CyberArk if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 14.3)
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
  • Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation

Choose SailPoint if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 49% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need CSA STAR Level 2 or C5 or EU-US DPF or FedRAMP Moderate or GovRAMP or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Specialist in identity governance and administration

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric CyberArk SailPoint
Visibility score15.6%14.3%
Change vs last weekup+2.1%up+0.4%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#7#8
Share of voice6.1%5.3%
Mentions this run1917
Positive in AI answers49%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3CyberArk 16%

CyberArk +0.5pp · SailPoint −1.1999999999999993pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

CyberArk leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
17.5%
21.4%
AI Mode
16.5%
10.2%
Perplexity
14.6%
18.5%
CyberArkSailPoint

Head to head in AI answers

20 engine answers name both brands

9CyberArk ranked higher
11SailPoint ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCyberArkSailPoint
DeploymentSelf-hosted and SaaSCloud (multi-tenant SaaS) and on-premises (IdentityIQ)
Integrations—200+
ComplianceSOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPACSA STAR Level 2, C5, EU-US DPF, FedRAMP Moderate, GovRAMP, IRAP, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, Common Criteria
SupportSupport contact, Knowledge base, Technical communityCustomer support requests
Founded19992005
HeadquartersNewton, MA, United StatesAustin, Texas, United States
Employees1,001–5,0001,001–5,000
FundingPost-IPO debtIPO
Best forEnterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities.Large enterprises with complex, hybrid or heavily regulated environments needing identity governance for human, machine and AI identities

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

CyberArk

  • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
  • Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
  • Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
  • Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
  • Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM

    SailPoint

    • Specialist in identity governance and administration
    • Strong compliance, access reviews, and segregation of duties
    • Recognized by analysts and peer reviews for IGA
    • Suited to large, complex enterprise governance needs
    • High cost profile for enterprise deployments
    • Pricing requires custom quotes and multi-year contracts

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs SailPoint”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-sailpoint, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.