FyleEffortless expense management for your existing credit cards. Now part of Sage.
vs
MediusAutonomous AP, powered by agentic AI
Comparison · Expense Management · weekly run Nov 2
Fyle vs Medius
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Fyle is the stronger AI pick in Expense Management: it has a visibility score of 14.8 versus 0 for Medius.
Choose Fyle if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.8 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 or GDPR or PCI DSS coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- seamless sync with accounting and ERP systems
Choose Medius if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 9001 or SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Fyle | Medius |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.8% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Expense Management | #9 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 11% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Fyle 0pp · Medius 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Fyle leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FyleMedius
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Fyle ranked higher
0Medius ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Fyle | Medius |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $11.99 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Web app and mobile app | 100% cloud-based |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, PCI DSS | ISO 27001:2022, ISO 9001, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Basic email and knowledge base support, Optional premium support with live chat during business hours, 24/7 support via live chat and email for Business plan users, Named account manager on Business and Enterprise plans | Standard Support (AP Essentials plan), Customer success team, Educational webinars and excellence program |
| Founded | 2017 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Newark, Delaware, United States | Linköping, Sweden |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round listed by Tracxn as Series A, amount not disclosed · $11M raised | Minority stake (private equity, Advent International) |
| Best for | Small businesses and mid-market companies that pay expenses on corporate credit cards. | Midsize and enterprise finance teams, especially product-based industries with high invoice volumes |
Plans side by side
Fyle
Growth$11.99active user/month, billed annually (min 5 users)
Business$14.99active user/month, billed annually (min 10 users)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, 250+ employees
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Fyle
- seamless sync with accounting and ERP systems
- real-time expense tracking with corporate cards
- auto-categorizes expenses based on learned behavior
- strong user ratings, around 4.8/5 on G2
Medius
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fyle vs Medius”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fyle-vs-medius, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.