GetAcceptRun every deal like your best sales rep
vs
SigneasySign effortlessly, manage contracts intelligently.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
GetAccept vs Signeasy
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GetAccept is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 15.7 versus 0.7 for Signeasy.
Choose GetAccept if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.7 vs 0.7)
- You need CCPA or eIDAS (AdES, QES) coverage
- All-in-one proposal and e-signature tool with document tracking
- Strong interactive deal rooms and sales-room features
Choose Signeasy if…
- You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $25)
- You need ESIGN & UETA or eIDAS or HIPAA or 21 CFR Part 11 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GetAccept | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.7% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #8 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 4.8% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 26 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GetAccept 0pp · Signeasy 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GetAccept leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GetAcceptSigneasy
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GetAccept ranked higher
0Signeasy ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GetAccept | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $25 per seat / mo | $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS | Web, mobile and API |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA, eIDAS (AdES, QES) | ESIGN & UETA, eIDAS, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, 21 CFR Part 11 |
| Support | Help center and chat support (06:00–00:00 UTC), Dedicated customer success manager (add-on) | Email support, Chat support, Priority support, Dedicated success manager |
| Founded | 2015 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | Dallas, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B, led by Bessemer Venture Partners | Series B |
| Best for | B2B sales teams: smaller teams that need e-signature, and larger teams scaling complex sales processes on the AI-native plan | Teams that need eSignatures together with a contract repository and renewal tracking, such as finance, HR, sales, legal operations and IT. |
Plans side by side
GetAccept
eSign$25per user/month
Professional$49per user/month, minimum 5 users
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Signeasy
Personal$10month/seat
Business$20month/seat
Business Pro$30month/seat
Build Your Plan (eSign)Customcustom
ICM Core$45month/seat, minimum 3 seats
ICM Pro$60month/seat, minimum 3 seats
Build Your Plan (ICM)Customcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GetAccept
- All-in-one proposal and e-signature tool with document tracking
- Strong interactive deal rooms and sales-room features
- Good fit for heavier sales-enablement needs
- Suited to multi-stakeholder B2B SaaS deals
- Strong buyer engagement and analytics for CRM-centred sales
Signeasy
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GetAccept vs Signeasy”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/getaccept-vs-signeasy, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.