Better Proposals vs Signeasy
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Better Proposals is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 26.1 versus 0.7 for Signeasy, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Better Proposals if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (26.1 vs 0.7)
- You need GDPR compliance or EU and US electronic signature legislation compliance coverage
- Fast proposal creation and implementation
- Low-cost, budget-friendly pricing with annual discounts
Choose Signeasy if…
- You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $13)
- You need ESIGN & UETA or eIDAS or SOC 2 or GDPR or HIPAA or 21 CFR Part 11 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Better Proposals | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 26.1% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #5 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 5.8% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 66% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Better Proposals 0pp · Signeasy 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Better Proposals leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Better Proposals | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Most affordable proposal and contract tool that is still reliable | Perplexity | #2 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Better Proposals | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $13 per seat / mo | $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted web application on AWS | Web, mobile and API |
| Compliance | GDPR compliance, EU and US electronic signature legislation compliance | ESIGN & UETA, eIDAS, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, 21 CFR Part 11 |
| Support | 24-hour support by chat and email from a human team, Average response time of about 2 minutes | Email support, Chat support, Priority support, Dedicated success manager |
| Founded | — | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Brighton, United Kingdom | Dallas, Texas |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series B |
| Best for | Small businesses, freelancers and service businesses that send proposals, contracts and onboarding documents. | Teams that need eSignatures together with a contract repository and renewal tracking, such as finance, HR, sales, legal operations and IT. |
Plans side by side
Better Proposals
Signeasy
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Better Proposals
- Fast proposal creation and implementation
- Low-cost, budget-friendly pricing with annual discounts
- Ready-to-go industry template library
- Polished, attractive proposals that look like micro-websites
- Suited to freelancers and small agencies, with built-in payment collection
- Narrower focus on proposals than broader contract suites
Signeasy
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Better Proposals vs Signeasy”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/better-proposals-vs-signeasy, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.