GitHubThe home of software development
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
GitHub vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 7.2 for Make, and ranks ahead in 60% of the answers that name both.
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 7.2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 41% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
Choose Make if…
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitHub | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.2% | 7.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #10 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 1.8% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub 0pp · Make 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GitHubMake
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
3GitHub ranked higher
2Make ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | GitHub | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | ChatGPT | #2 | #1 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | AI Mode | #3 | #7 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #1 | #6 |
| Top project management tool options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #3 | #6 |
| Best project management tool for startups | AI Mode | #7 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised | — |
| Best for | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/github-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.