GitHubThe home of software development
vs
PlaniswareAI-powered strategic portfolio management
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
GitHub vs Planisware
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 2.8 for Planisware.
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 2.8)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
Choose Planisware if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (75% vs 48% positive)
- You need ISO-certified standards coverage
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitHub | Planisware |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.2% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #10 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 75% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub 0pp · Planisware 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GitHubPlanisware
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GitHub ranked higher
0Planisware ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub | Planisware |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server | Cloud-based SaaS on a fully owned, single-tenant cloud infrastructure |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO | ISO-certified standards |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) | — |
| Founded | 2008 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Châtillon, France |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised | IPO on Euronext Paris (about €278 million including over-allotment) |
| Best for | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | PMOs that need a turnkey PPM solution with immediate results and room to grow |
Plans side by side
Planisware
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Planisware
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub vs Planisware”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/github-vs-planisware, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.