Asana vs Planisware
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Asana is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 60.9 versus 2.8 for Planisware, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Asana if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.9 vs 2.8)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
Choose Planisware if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (75% vs 42% positive)
- You need ISO-certified standards coverage
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Asana | Planisware |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 60.9% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #1 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 11.7% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 64 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 75% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Asana 0pp · Planisware 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Asana leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Asana | Planisware |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best project management tool for enterprise | Perplexity | #4 | #8 |
| Compare the leading Project Management platforms | Perplexity | #1 | #17 |
| Which Project Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #1 | #7 |
| Official website of the top project management tool vendors | AI Mode | #1 | #10 |
| Official website of the top project management tool vendors | Perplexity | #1 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Asana | Planisware |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud-based SaaS on a fully owned, single-tenant cloud infrastructure |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) | ISO-certified standards |
| Support | Help Center, Community, Asana Academy, Customer Success | — |
| Founded | 2008 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Châtillon, France |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series E | IPO on Euronext Paris (about €278 million including over-allotment) |
| Best for | Individuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments. | PMOs that need a turnkey PPM solution with immediate results and room to grow |
Plans side by side
Asana
Planisware
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Asana
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
- Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
- Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
- Strongest general-purpose project management choice
- Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination
Planisware
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Asana vs Planisware”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/asana-vs-planisware, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.