GitHubThe home of software development
vs
TeamworkMost tools track work. We make it profitable.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
GitHub vs Teamwork
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 9.6 for Teamwork.
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 9.6)
- You want a lower entry price ($4 vs $9.99)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 12% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
Choose Teamwork if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
- Rated Editors' Choice by PCMag at 4.5/5 and recommended for client services
- Included in strong general project management shortlist
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitHub | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.2% | 9.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #10 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 12% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub 0pp · Teamwork 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GitHubTeamwork
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0GitHub ranked higher
0Teamwork ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9.99 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server | Cloud-hosted SaaS on Amazon Web Services, with US or EU data hosting. |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) | Premium support, Dedicated customer success manager (Enterprise), Free expert training, Onboarding services |
| Founded | 2008 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Cork, Ireland |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised | Growth investment from Bregal Milestone |
| Best for | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | Agencies, consultancies, IT services and implementation teams that bill clients for project work. |
Plans side by side
Teamwork
Free$0per user/month billed yearly
Basics$9.99per user/month billed yearly
Accelerate$24.99per user/month billed yearly
OptimizeCustomper user/month billed yearly, contact sales
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Teamwork
- Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
- Rated Editors' Choice by PCMag at 4.5/5 and recommended for client services
- Included in strong general project management shortlist
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub vs Teamwork”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/github-vs-teamwork, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.