Skip to content
SlateIndex
monday.comThe AI workspace for people and agents
vs
TeamworkMost tools track work. We make it profitable.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3

monday.com vs Teamwork

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

monday.com is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 45.8 versus 9.6 for Teamwork, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose monday.com if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (45.8 vs 9.6)
  • You want a lower entry price ($9 vs $9.99)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 12% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27032:2023 or ISO/IEC 27701:2019 or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP coverage

Choose Teamwork if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
  • Rated Editors' Choice by PCMag at 4.5/5 and recommended for client services
  • Included in strong general project management shortlist

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric monday.com Teamwork
Visibility score45.8%9.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Project Management#2#11
Share of voice9.6%2.5%
Mentions this run5215
Positive in AI answers33%12%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3monday.com 46%

monday.com 0pp · Teamwork 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

monday.com leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
52.8%
5.6%
AI Mode
49.6%
1.1%
Perplexity
35%
22.2%
monday.comTeamwork

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

8monday.com ranked higher
0Teamwork ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

Dimensionmonday.comTeamwork
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $9 per seat / moFree; paid from $9.99 per seat / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloudCloud-hosted SaaS on Amazon Web Services, with US or EU data hosting.
Integrations850+—
ComplianceSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27032:2023, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, CSA STAR, TX-RAMPISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2
SupportHelp center, 24/7 support, Enterprise onboarding and training, WebinarsPremium support, Dedicated customer success manager (Enterprise), Free expert training, Onboarding services
Founded20121999
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelCork, Ireland
Employees1,001–5,000201–500
FundingPost-IPO Equity · $235M raisedGrowth investment from Bregal Milestone
Best forTeams that want their CRM on the same platform as their project and delivery workAgencies, consultancies, IT services and implementation teams that bill clients for project work.

Plans side by side

monday.com

Free$0free forever, up to 2 seats
Basic$9seat / month, billed annually
Standard$12seat / month, billed annually
Pro$19seat / month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom price
monday.com pricing

Teamwork

Free$0per user/month billed yearly
Basics$9.99per user/month billed yearly
Accelerate$24.99per user/month billed yearly
OptimizeCustomper user/month billed yearly, contact sales
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
Teamwork pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

monday.com

  • Highly customizable visual boards and workspace
  • Strong workflow automation
  • User-friendly and quick to onboard teams
  • Top ratings and high user satisfaction
  • Clear, transparent per-seat pricing tiers

    Teamwork

    • Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
    • Rated Editors' Choice by PCMag at 4.5/5 and recommended for client services
    • Included in strong general project management shortlist

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “monday.com vs Teamwork”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/monday-com-vs-teamwork, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.