Glassbox vs Piwik PRO
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 4.3 for Piwik PRO, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Glassbox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 4.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 50% positive)
- You need ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Piwik PRO if…
- You need HIPAA (BAA) coverage
- Privacy-first alternative with enterprise-level data control
- Strong fit for regulated industries like healthcare, banking, and government
- Recommended for compliance-sensitive and privacy-sensitive organizations
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | Piwik PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 4.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · Piwik PRO 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glassbox leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Glassbox | Piwik PRO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #11 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | Piwik PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | $25,000 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | Cloud-hosted in Azure US regions for HIPAA deployments, with private or public cloud options available. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA (BAA) |
| Support | — | Dedicated technical support, Implementation, Onboarding and training |
| Founded | 2010 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Wroclaw, Poland |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | Series A · $2M raised |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Healthcare providers, universities and business associates that need HIPAA-supportive web analytics. |
Plans side by side
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Piwik PRO
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
Piwik PRO
- Privacy-first alternative with enterprise-level data control
- Strong fit for regulated industries like healthcare, banking, and government
- Recommended for compliance-sensitive and privacy-sensitive organizations
- Robust free and mid-market tier
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Piwik PRO”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-piwik-pro, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.