Amplitude vs Glassbox
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Amplitude is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 79.4 versus 2.2 for Glassbox, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose Amplitude if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (79.4 vs 2.2)
- You need ISO 27018 or GDPR or CCPA or HIPAA or EU-US Data Privacy Framework (self-certified) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- deep behavioral analytics
Choose Glassbox if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 47% positive)
- You need ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Amplitude | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 79.4% | 2.2% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.7% | New |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #1 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 16.4% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 76 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 47% | 83% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Amplitude +2.700000000000003pp · Glassbox +2.2pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Amplitude leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Amplitude | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which product analytics tool has the best reviews? | ChatGPT | #6 | #1 |
| Which Product Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #1 | #8 |
| Which Product Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #1 | #8 |
| Official website of the top product analytics tool vendors | ChatGPT | #1 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Amplitude | Glassbox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on AWS, with US and EU data centers. | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. |
| Integrations | 159+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, EU-US Data Privacy Framework (self-certified) | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 |
| Support | Online support, Access to community and education resources, Customer success and assigned account manager on Enterprise, Professional services | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C · $336M raised | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised |
| Best for | Product teams that want analytics, experimentation and AI-driven insights in one platform, from early-stage startups on the free plan to large enterprises. | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. |
Plans side by side
Amplitude
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Amplitude
- deep behavioral analytics
- industry-standard, leading product analytics platform
- strong for enterprise scalability and data governance
- generous free tier
- combines analytics with experimentation and session replays
- steep pricing at enterprise scale
- requires custom quotes for paid plans
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Amplitude vs Glassbox”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amplitude-vs-glassbox, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.