Glassbox vs Quantum Metric
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 2.6 for Quantum Metric, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Glassbox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 2.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
Choose Quantum Metric if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or HITRUST coverage
- Blends quantitative product analytics with qualitative context like session replays and error monitoring
- Strong recognition from analysts and research
- Best for enterprise digital experience and session replay
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | Quantum Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 2.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · Quantum Metric 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glassbox leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Glassbox | Quantum Metric |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #7 | #8 |
| Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #7 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | Quantum Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | Cloud-based service |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HITRUST |
| Support | — | Dedicated account management and customer success team, Onboarding under industry-specific playbooks, Expert-led and self-guided training, Ongoing consultation with customer success experts |
| Founded | 2010 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Colorado Springs, Colorado, US |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Enterprise CX, product, UX, marketing and development teams in retail, financial services, travel and hospitality, telco, gaming and healthcare. |
Plans side by side
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Quantum Metric
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
Quantum Metric
- Blends quantitative product analytics with qualitative context like session replays and error monitoring
- Strong recognition from analysts and research
- Best for enterprise digital experience and session replay
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Quantum Metric”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-quantum-metric, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.