GrafanaFull-stack observability for the agentic era
vs
Qlik SenseDo Data Differently
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2
Grafana vs Qlik Sense
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qlik Sense is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 28.8 versus 0 for Grafana.
Choose Grafana if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 33% positive)
- You need FedRAMP or NATSEC100 or PCI DSS or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR coverage
- Permanent free tier
- Open, composable, flexible platform
Choose Qlik Sense if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.8 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27017 or SOC 2 Type 2 or HITRUST CSF or German BSI C5 attestation or FedRAMP Moderate or DoD IL2 or GovRAMP Moderate or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or TISAX or HIPAA or CJIS or TX-RAMP coverage
- Proprietary associative engine for real-time data exploration
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Grafana | Qlik Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 28.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Business Intelligence | #44 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 8% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 42 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Grafana 0pp · Qlik Sense 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qlik Sense leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GrafanaQlik Sense
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Grafana ranked higher
0Qlik Sense ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Grafana | Qlik Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed Grafana Cloud on Public Cloud, Federal Cloud or Bring Your Own Cloud, plus self-managed Grafana Enterprise | Cloud, on-premises and hybrid |
| Compliance | FedRAMP, NATSEC100, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, CSA STAR | ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27017, SOC 2 Type 2, HITRUST CSF, German BSI C5 attestation, FedRAMP Moderate, DoD IL2, GovRAMP Moderate, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, TISAX, HIPAA, CJIS, TX-RAMP |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), 8x5 email support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan) | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 1993 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series E · $1100M raised | Minority stake sale to ADIA subsidiary and new Thoma Bravo equity investment |
| Best for | Teams that want open-standard observability without lock-in, from startups to Fortune 500 enterprises | — |
Plans side by side
Qlik Sense
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Grafana
- Permanent free tier
- Open, composable, flexible platform
- Strong open-source, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support
- Cost-effective, good value
- Managed hosting
- Complex multi-dimensional usage-based billing
- Self-hosting demands significant engineering maintenance
- Capped free-tier limits
Qlik Sense
- Proprietary associative engine for real-time data exploration
- Robust data integration capabilities
- Strong, trusted data governance
- Robust AI-driven insights and conversational AI
- Frequently recommended by analysts for BI shortlists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Grafana vs Qlik Sense”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/grafana-vs-qlik-sense, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.