GrafanaFull-stack observability for the agentic era
vs
ZabbixThe universal, open source observability solution for IT & OT
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Grafana vs Zabbix
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Grafana is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.8 versus 0 for Zabbix.
Choose Grafana if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.8 vs 0)
- You need FedRAMP or NATSEC100 or PCI DSS or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Permanent free tier
Choose Zabbix if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Grafana | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 47.8% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #2 | #45 |
| Share of voice | 9.8% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 58 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Grafana 0pp · Zabbix 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Grafana leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GrafanaZabbix
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Grafana ranked higher
0Zabbix ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Grafana | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed Grafana Cloud on Public Cloud, Federal Cloud or Bring Your Own Cloud, plus self-managed Grafana Enterprise | On-premise, on public cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud), or as Zabbix Cloud SaaS |
| Compliance | FedRAMP, NATSEC100, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, CSA STAR | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015 |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), 8x5 email support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan) | 24/7 support from the Zabbix team, Partner network of over 290 partners, Professional services, Training courses |
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | Riga, Latvia |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series E · $1100M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Teams that want open-standard observability without lock-in, from startups to Fortune 500 enterprises | Organizations that need full control and data privacy, such as high-security and regulated industries, and managed service providers |
Plans side by side
Zabbix
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Grafana
- Permanent free tier
- Open, composable, flexible platform
- Strong open-source, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support
- Cost-effective, good value
- Managed hosting
- Complex multi-dimensional usage-based billing
- Self-hosting demands significant engineering maintenance
- Capped free-tier limits
Zabbix
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Grafana vs Zabbix”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/grafana-vs-zabbix, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.