GroundcoverThe full-stack observability platform for engineers & agents
vs
LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Groundcover vs Langfuse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Groundcover is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 1.4 for Langfuse.
Choose Groundcover if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 1.4)
- You need CCPA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Predictable flat per-node pricing
Choose Langfuse if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29 vs $30)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or HIPAA-ready region coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Groundcover | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.4% | 1.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #23 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Groundcover 0pp · Langfuse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Groundcover leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GroundcoverLangfuse
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Groundcover ranked higher
0Langfuse ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Groundcover | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $30 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $29 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Bring Your Own Cloud: the data plane runs inside the customer's VPC and is managed by groundcover. A fully on-premises option is offered on the On Premise plan. | Langfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT license |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR |
| Support | Slack community support (Free plan), Standard support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan) | Community support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2021 | — |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series A · $160M raised | Seed · $4M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams running cloud-native and Kubernetes workloads that want full-stack observability without code changes and predictable pricing. | Engineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluation |
Plans side by side
Groundcover
Free$0
Pro$30per host, per month
Enterprise$35per host, per month
On Premise$50per host, per month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Groundcover
- Predictable flat per-node pricing
- Pricing claims should be verified before purchase
Langfuse
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
- Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Groundcover vs Langfuse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/groundcover-vs-langfuse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.