HackerRankCoding test and interview solution for hiring developers
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
HackerRank vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.7 for HackerRank.
Choose HackerRank if…
- You want a lower entry price ($79 vs $149)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (17% vs 0% positive)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | HackerRank | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #54 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HackerRank 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HackerRankLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0HackerRank ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HackerRank | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $79 / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on Amazon Web Services | — |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR | — |
| Support | Standard support on Starter and Pro, premium support on Enterprise, Dedicated account manager on Enterprise, White-glove onboarding on Enterprise | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, California, United States | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $118M raised | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Companies hiring developers, from two-founder startups to Fortune 500 enterprises | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
HackerRank
Starter$79per month, billed annually at $948
Pro$419per month, billed annually at $5,028
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HackerRank
- Automated sending of coding tests
- Automatic score push to candidate dashboard
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HackerRank vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hackerrank-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.