GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
HackerRankCoding test and interview solution for hiring developers
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Greenhouse vs HackerRank
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 0.7 for HackerRank, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose HackerRank if…
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Automated sending of coding tests
- Automatic score push to candidate dashboard
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | HackerRank |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #54 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · HackerRank 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GreenhouseHackerRank
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Greenhouse ranked higher
1HackerRank ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | HackerRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a recruiting platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #14 | #10 |
| What should a recruiting platform integrate with? | AI Mode | #2 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | HackerRank |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $79 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | — | Standard support on Starter and Pro, premium support on Enterprise, Dedicated account manager on Enterprise, White-glove onboarding on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Santa Clara, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Series D · $118M raised |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Companies hiring developers, from two-founder startups to Fortune 500 enterprises |
Plans side by side
HackerRank
Starter$79per month, billed annually at $948
Pro$419per month, billed annually at $5,028
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
HackerRank
- Automated sending of coding tests
- Automatic score push to candidate dashboard
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs HackerRank”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-hackerrank, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.