HiredRecruiting
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Hired vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 3.1 for Recruiterflow.
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 3.1)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Hired | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #25 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hired 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HiredRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Hired ranked higher
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hired | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 30+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | — | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $133M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Employers hiring tech and sales talent | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Hired
Pricing not available.
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hired
Profile in progress.
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hired vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hired-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.