HiredRecruiting
vs
VincereAgentic AI recruitment software, built for modern staffing and recruitment agencies.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Hired vs Vincere
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.3 for Vincere.
Choose Hired if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.3)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Vincere if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Hired | Vincere |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #25 | #65 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hired 0pp · Vincere 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hired leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HiredVincere
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Hired ranked higher
0Vincere ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hired | Vincere |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based and on-premises |
| Headquarters | Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH) | — |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $133M raised | Investment round (announced) · $14M raised |
| Best for | Employers hiring tech and sales talent | Staffing and recruitment agencies |
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hired vs Vincere”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hired-vs-vincere, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.