hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
hireEZ vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
hireEZ is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2.5 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose hireEZ if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.5 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (29% vs 17% positive)
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
Choose Loxo if…
- You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $494)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 40+)
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | hireEZ | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #33 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
hireEZ 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
hireEZ leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
hireEZLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2hireEZ ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | hireEZ | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | ChatGPT | #3 | #6 |
| How much does AmazingHiring cost? | ChatGPT | #3 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | hireEZ | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $494 per seat / mo | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. | — |
| Integrations | 40+ | 100+ |
| Support | — | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California, US | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “hireEZ vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hireez-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.