hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
vs
ManatalThe next generation of AI-powered recruitment software.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
hireEZ vs Manatal
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Manatal is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 15 versus 2.5 for hireEZ, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose hireEZ if…
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
Choose Manatal if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15 vs 2.5)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $494)
- You need more native integrations (2500+ vs 40+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 29% positive)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | hireEZ | Manatal |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.5% | 15% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #33 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 3.8% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 22 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
hireEZ 0pp · Manatal 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Manatal leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
hireEZManatal
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
2hireEZ ranked higher
2Manatal ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | hireEZ | Manatal |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #12 | #8 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #15 | #10 |
| Best recruiting platform with AI features | Perplexity | #6 | #7 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #21 | #23 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | hireEZ | Manatal |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $494 per seat / mo | $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 40+ | 2500+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | — | 24/5 live chat, Email support, In-app training and interactive onboarding, Documentation |
| Founded | 2015 | — |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California, US | Bangkok, Thailand |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C | Seed · $5M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. | HR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters |
Plans side by side
Manatal
Professional$15per user per month, billed annually
Enterprise$35per user per month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$55per user per month, billed annually
CustomCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Manatal
- Advanced AI-driven candidate enrichment and match scoring
- Affordable pricing with annual savings
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Cheapest per-recruiter pricing among compared tools
- Recommended for lower-cost recruiting software
- Entry plan limits the number of open jobs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “hireEZ vs Manatal”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hireez-vs-manatal, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.