Skip to content
SlateIndex
ManatalThe next generation of AI-powered recruitment software.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Manatal vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 15 for Manatal, and ranks ahead in 72% of the answers that name both.

Choose Manatal if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $299)
  • You need more native integrations (2500+ vs 270+)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Advanced AI-driven candidate enrichment and match scoring

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 15)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 33% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Manatal Workable
Visibility score15%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#8#2
Share of voice3.8%7.2%
Mentions this run2238
Positive in AI answers33%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Manatal 15%

Manatal 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
18.1%
34.1%
AI Mode
4.1%
29.4%
Perplexity
22.8%
26.7%
ManatalWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

18 engine answers name both brands

5Manatal ranked higher
13Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionManatalWorkable
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$15 per seat / mo$299 / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo · 15-day trial
DeploymentCloud-basedCloud-based SaaS
Integrations2500+270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
Support24/5 live chat, Email support, In-app training and interactive onboarding, DocumentationPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded—2012
HeadquartersBangkok, ThailandBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeed · $5M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forHR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhuntersCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Manatal

Professional$15per user per month, billed annually
Enterprise$35per user per month, billed annually
Enterprise Plus$55per user per month, billed annually
CustomCustomcontact sales
Manatal pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Manatal

  • Advanced AI-driven candidate enrichment and match scoring
  • Affordable pricing with annual savings
  • Free trial with no credit card required
  • Cheapest per-recruiter pricing among compared tools
  • Recommended for lower-cost recruiting software
  • Entry plan limits the number of open jobs

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Manatal vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/manatal-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.