hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
vs
PinFrom job description to booked interviews.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
hireEZ vs Pin
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pin is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.9 versus 2.5 for hireEZ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose hireEZ if…
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
Choose Pin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.9 vs 2.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (120+ vs 40+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 29% positive)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | hireEZ | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.5% | 3.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #33 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
hireEZ 0pp · Pin 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pin leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
hireEZPin
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0hireEZ ranked higher
1Pin ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | hireEZ | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #8 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | hireEZ | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $494 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $100 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. | — |
| Integrations | 40+ | 120+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | — | Knowledge base, Email support, Onboarding and training (Professional and Enterprise), Dedicated account manager (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2015 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California, US | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series C | Seed · $3M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. | Agencies, founders, recruiting teams and hiring managers who need to fill open roles with outreach and scheduling handled. |
Plans side by side
Pin
Free$0forever
Solo$100per user per month, billed annually
Professional$135per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Pin
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “hireEZ vs Pin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hireez-vs-pin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.