GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
PinFrom job description to booked interviews.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Greenhouse vs Pin
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 3.9 for Pin, and ranks ahead in 83% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 3.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 50% positive)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Pin if…
- You want a free plan to start
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 3.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #22 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · Pin 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GreenhousePin
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
5Greenhouse ranked higher
1Pin ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #1 | #7 |
| Best recruiting platform for enterprise | AI Mode | #4 | #9 |
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | AI Mode | #1 | #10 |
| Which recruiting vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #2 | #1 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | AI Mode | #1 | #5 |
| Who makes the most used recruiting platform? | AI Mode | #4 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $100 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Integrations | — | 120+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | — | Knowledge base, Email support, Onboarding and training (Professional and Enterprise), Dedicated account manager (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | — |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Seed · $3M raised |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Agencies, founders, recruiting teams and hiring managers who need to fill open roles with outreach and scheduling handled. |
Plans side by side
Pin
Free$0forever
Solo$100per user per month, billed annually
Professional$135per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Pin
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Pin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-pin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.