Humanly vs LinkedIn

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

LinkedIn is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 19.1 versus 0.6 for Humanly, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Humanly if…

conversational 24/7 AI screening
automated scheduling
front-end candidate engagement

Choose LinkedIn if…

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.1 vs 0.6)
Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
One-click job posting to LinkedIn and other boards

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric	Humanly	LinkedIn
Visibility score	0.6%	19.1%
Change vs last week	New	New
Rank in Recruiting	#58	#5
Share of voice	0.4%	4.3%
Mentions this run	2	23
Positive in AI answers	—	26%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Humanly 0pp · LinkedIn 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

LinkedIn leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

0.9%

29.6%

AI Mode

0.9%

14.4%

Perplexity

13.3%

HumanlyLinkedIn

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Humanly ranked higher

0LinkedIn ranked higher

Prompt	Engine	Humanly	LinkedIn
Compare the leading recruiting platforms	ChatGPT	#17	#18

Features, pricing & fit

Dimension	Humanly	LinkedIn
Support	Vendor team can help design and optimize AI Interviewers on request	—
Founded	2020	—
Headquarters	Seattle, Washington	—
Employees	11–50	—
Funding	Series B · $52M raised	IPO (NYSE)
Best for	High-volume hiring teams recruiting hourly, frontline and field workers	Recruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates