ProposifyProposal software that gives you control and insight into the close.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Proposify vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Proposify is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 41.4 versus 28.3 for Qwilr, and ranks ahead in 84% of the answers that name both.
Choose Proposify if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (41.4 vs 28.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR coverage
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $49)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 49% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Proposify | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 41.4% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #2 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 9.4% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 49 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Proposify 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Proposify leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ProposifyQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
32 engine answers name both brands
27Proposify ranked higher
5Qwilr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Proposify | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a proposal and contract tool for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #2 | #3 |
| How do I choose a proposal and contract tool for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #3 | #4 |
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #2 | #3 |
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #4 | #2 |
| What are the best Proposals & Contracts tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #4 | #3 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #2 | #3 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | AI Mode | #3 | #5 |
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #4 | #3 |
| Best proposal and contract tool for startups | ChatGPT | #4 | #5 |
| Which proposal and contract tool has the best reviews? | AI Mode | #4 | #5 |
| Which proposal and contract tool has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #5 | #4 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #2 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Proposify | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $49 per seat / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Email and chat support, Phone and Zoom support, Dedicated success manager on Scale plan, Priority support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth Equity - II (CB Insights) | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Busy sales teams that send proposals and quotes, such as consultants and service firms in landscaping, janitorial and construction. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Proposify
Build$49user/month (monthly); $39/user/mo billed annually ($468/user/year)
Grow$65user/month, billed annually ($780/user/year)
Scale$12,800year platform fee, includes 10 users; extra users $780/user/year
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Proposify
- Visually rich, branded proposal design
- Robust tracking and granular proposal analytics
- Well-regarded with strong user satisfaction
- Quotes and contracts with built-in approval workflows
- Discounted annual pricing lowers effective per-user cost
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Proposify vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/proposify-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.