JetOctopusTechnical SEO Platform for Google & AI Search
vs
LumarFind, prioritize, and fix SEO, GEO/AEO, & website issues at scale
Comparison · SEO Tools · weekly run Nov 2
JetOctopus vs Lumar
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Lumar is the stronger AI pick in SEO Tools: it has a visibility score of 0.8 versus 0.4 for JetOctopus.
Choose JetOctopus if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- deep server log analysis
Choose Lumar if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.8 vs 0.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | JetOctopus | Lumar |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 0.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in SEO Tools | #40 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
JetOctopus 0pp · Lumar 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Lumar leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
JetOctopusLumar
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0JetOctopus ranked higher
0Lumar ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | JetOctopus | Lumar |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $349 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS | Cloud-based |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Standard online support, Online support with Slack channel on higher plans, 24/7 dedicated support on Enterprise | Dedicated SEO and GEO professional services team with strategy help and regular crawl reviews, Customer success team |
| Founded | 2018 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tallinn, Estonia | New York, NY, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series B |
| Best for | Large websites, enterprise SEO teams and agencies | Enterprise SEO, web accessibility and digital marketing teams running large, complex websites |
Plans side by side
JetOctopus
Growth (In-House Teams)$349month, billed annually ($459/month quarterly)
Pro (In-House Teams)$809month, billed annually ($1089/month quarterly)
Ultra (In-House Teams)$1,559month, billed annually ($2069/month quarterly)
UnlimitedCustomcontact sales
Lumar
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
JetOctopus
- deep server log analysis
Lumar
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “JetOctopus vs Lumar”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jetoctopus-vs-lumar, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.